Treatment in patients’ best interests
نویسنده
چکیده
A note on the current state of the law as regards balancing the autonomy, and personal values, of a mentally incapacitated patient against treatment plans with which they do not agree. The author summarises the outcomes of two medical treatment cases heard by the Court of Protection, with similar facts and different results, by way of adding to the advice to practitioners for their communications with patients and families in such situations.
منابع مشابه
Best interests in persistent vegetative state.
Letters Best interests in persistent vegetative state SIR While I agree with several points raised in your recent editorial' on my paper, Applying best interests to persistent vegetative state-a principled distortion?,2 I must respond to a number of other issues which you raise. I agree unreservedly with your caveat that both doctors and judges must act within the law. My paper, however, sought...
متن کاملApplying best interests to persistent vegetative state--a principled distortion?
"Best interests" is widely accepted as the appropriate foundation principle for medico-legal decisions concerning treatment withdrawal from patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS). Its application appears to progress logically from earlier use regarding legally incompetent patients. This author argues, however, that such confidence in the relevance of the principle of best interests to PV...
متن کاملA defence of the requirement to seek consent to withhold and withdraw futile treatments.
Futility assessments, which are unavoidable in end-of-life settings, need to be procedurally fair. This necessitates communication between health professionals and substitute decisionmakers regarding the decision to define treatments as futile. The common law test for whether treatment should be withheld or withdrawn is the best interests test. A futile treatment is not in any patient's best in...
متن کاملBest interests at end of life: an updated review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
PURPOSE To increase our understanding of the notion of "best interests" in end of life disagreements through an updated review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario. There was a significant increase (235%) in decisions from this tribunal between 2009 and 2011. "Best interests" test is used when no prior expressed wishes are known to the surrogate decision-makers. METH...
متن کاملPsychiatrists' attitudes towards autonomy, best interests and compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: a questionnaire survey
BACKGROUND The compulsory treatment of anorexia nervosa is a contentious issue. Research suggests that psychiatrists have a range of attitudes towards patients suffering from anorexia nervosa, and towards the use of compulsory treatment for the disorder. METHODS A postal self-completed attitudinal questionnaire was sent to senior psychiatrists in the United Kingdom who were mostly general adu...
متن کامل‘Best interests’ in paediatric intensive care: an empirical ethics study
OBJECTIVE In English paediatric practice, English law requires that parents and clinicians agree the 'best interests' of children and, if this is not possible, that the courts decide. Court intervention is rare and the concept of best interests is ambiguous. We report qualitative research exploring how the best interests standard operates in practice, particularly with decisions related to plan...
متن کامل